Hello Guest

j2sdk version #'s

  • 2 Replies
  • 5754 Views
*

Offline dom

  • *
  • 12
    • http://www.domstyle.net
j2sdk version #'s
« on: November 11, 2004, 07:30:35 »
from j2sdk 1.4 .... j2sdk 5

that's a pretty significant jump in version numbers, eh?  why didn't sun just go to 1.5?

*

Offline oNyx

  • ***
  • 177
  • 弾幕
j2sdk version #'s
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2004, 08:24:10 »
1.2 -> 2
1.3 -> 3
1.4 -> 4
1.5 -> 5

It was a marketing decision... and imo it's not that bad. They just removed the pointless leading number, which most non techy people would consider as important ("Yea it's uhm... one dot something" - "Right.").

*

Offline dom

  • *
  • 12
    • http://www.domstyle.net
j2sdk version #'s
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2004, 20:01:59 »
i figured as much... i'm just all about consistency and conformity