LWJGL 2.1.0 Released!

Started by Matzon, March 23, 2009, 20:04:44

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Matzon

March 23, 2009, 20:04:44

  • AppletLoader: incorrect speed calculation
  • OpenAL: oal-soft 1.7.411
  • OpenAL: missing @OutParameter on alSourceUnqueueBuffers
  • OpenGL: Added support for glNamedBufferDataEXT(int buffer, long size, int usage)
  • All: Added Display.setDisplayModeAndFullscreen(mode) to switch mode and set fullscreen in one call
  • All: Renamed DisplayMode.isFullscreen() to DisplayMode.isFullscreenCapable and made it public
  • Linux: ATI mesa drivers issue
  • Linux:  Improved focus handling for Display.setParent()
  • Windows: 64bit lwjgl & OpenAL

https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=58488&package_id=54362&release_id=670417

Remember to donate ;)

elias4444

#1
March 23, 2009, 20:52:19
As always...

THANK YOU!!!!!
=-=-=-=-=-======-=-=-=-=-=-
http://www.tommytwisters.com

lamster

#2
March 23, 2009, 20:56:43
Thanks for the update.  I'm using alSourceUnqueueBuffers with LWJGL 2.0.1 -- what are the ramifications of the @OutParameter change?  Do I need to update to avoid a memory leak or other nastiness?

Matthias

#3
March 23, 2009, 21:56:59
When you used direct buffers with this method then it always worked ok. But when used with a wrapped int[] then the returned data was not copied back into the int[].

Ciao Matthias

numberR

#4
March 24, 2009, 18:37:56
awesome!

Fool Running

#5
March 24, 2009, 20:33:38
Congratulations on the new release.  8)
Keep up the good work.

EDIT: Why isn't this topic stickied?  ;D
Programmers will, one day, rule the world... and the world won't notice until its too late.Just testing the marquee option ;D

n.o.p

#6
May 02, 2009, 12:13:23
What exactly is oal-soft? Software emulation for OpenAL?

Matzon

#7
May 02, 2009, 17:38:17
It's a software only implementation that does not rely on DSPs. It does rely on direct sound on windows - so some hardware optimizations may occur. The actual processing of effects and so on are done in software. The end result is that it works the same across all platforms - unlike creatives - at the cost of a performance hit (insignificant by most).

n.o.p

#8
May 02, 2009, 18:01:46
Ok. But what will happen under Vista for Creative card owners? Doesn't Creative install the Alchemy-Wrapper which redirects Direct Sound to OpenAL? So they would have OAL-Soft Wrapper -> DirectSound -> Alchemy Wrapper -> OpenAL -> Hardware ?

elias

#9
May 02, 2009, 18:26:08
Quote from: n.o.p on May 02, 2009, 18:01:46
Ok. But what will happen under Vista for Creative card owners? Doesn't Creative install the Alchemy-Wrapper which redirects Direct Sound to OpenAL? So they would have OAL-Soft Wrapper -> DirectSound -> Alchemy Wrapper -> OpenAL -> Hardware ?

I don't know about Alchemy Wrapper, but if you're worrying about performance, please don't :) It's my bold claim that you could add a dozen of layers to al* calls and you won't notice it at all. What matters (a tiny bit) is where and how the mixing is done, and that's only done once.

- elias

n.o.p

#10
May 03, 2009, 05:04:44
All right, thanks for the explanation.

neakor

#11
June 27, 2009, 22:54:19
this might be a stupid question. but i couldnt find any info on the website.

so, with this 2.1.0 release, lwjgl is officially up to opengl 3.0? or 3.1?

thx in advance!

btw, great job!
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions